Hi Office Guy,
I would hardly call agreeing to disagree, whining. 
Sorry. Round about where I learned English, this is just a way of saying ... not much point in keeping on and on saying this. I then moved on to try to be constructive, recognize WebAssist's point, and then find a way round it.
I already made the suggestion to turn them into extensions so they could be protected with a key code
Sorry. If I had known that, I would not have opened my mouth. I must have missed that.
and it was rejected because it would require Dreamweaver.
OK. Policy decision, then.
That settles that.
At least I know more than I did before.
This is the second time we have had to deal with this, so I don't think it's likely to get better.
The only thing that will make it better, is finding a solution to this "problem". I am obviously not providing one, which is what you get for speaking when you are pig-ignorant. Sorry.
If you think there is no loss in value to go from unlimited sites to one,
Well ... actually ... I do. But I do also recognize the obvious, which is that WebAssist is doing its best to protect its interests. I don't like this solution to the solution problem, though.
The cost of using the solution for 10 sites just went from $100 to $1,000.
I know
I'm glad you're in a position where that kind of change is so trivial.
Dear Office Guy ... this is the second time you have completely misunderstood my post, or else something that I am saying. This time, I don't think I need a friend of mine to step in and point it out to me, which is at least something of an improvement on the last time, n'est-ce pas.
I may be very slow, and not as learned as some, but I am learning and willing to learn.
You stay well, now.
