A If CSS Form Builder is to be integrated witih DataAssist, things could get a lot worse. I tried Form Builder when it was released; when a two field login form created 1000 lines of CSS code, I knew this would not be a useful product as far as I was concerned. However DataAssist is useful, and hopefully will be better in the next release, particularly if it gets closer to ADDT.Tom Dupre
"I'm not interested" in Form Builder to. I did try it a couple of times, but like I said before it is unstable and producing enormous amounts of unnecessary code. Of course I understand what you are saying, but writing "I'm not interested in" or "I don't care" sounds like the discussion can only develop in one way "YOUR WAY" and just doesn't sound nice.
The reason I wrote my part about Form Builder is because I support your opinion about it. Nothing more nothing less.
I think the Web Assist developers will be smart enough when they design a real "DYNAMIC SUITE" to make modules in it like Form Builder and Data Assist which can be individually switched on and of. So I hope that solves the problem about Form Builder and Data Assist. Except for the useless code in Data Assist, but that can be better answered by a the developer of the extension.
I have complained about unnecessary code as well, but the reaction was that that extra code was necessary?! I think there will be more modules in this "Dynamic Suite" like Universal E-mail etc.
I also gave a alternative for the way Form Builder would be handy: "Producing basic forms and clear rules/styles to fine tune with CSS, when integrated with Web Assist . And only use the editor for basic forms no styling.
