To Stan and Ray
Ray if you had couched your intentions the way you just did I believe there would have been no problem. Going forward at least.
Though I still am deeply troubled about your willingness to make this change retroactively. That is unfair.
I never intended, nor do I think most users here would have used this solution pack as the end product. I saw it as a template, a guide, a jumping off point to greater things. It is after all what we've been asking for for some time, a more thorough "dissertation" on how it all goes together.
I expect that I will use the solution pack as a model more than once incorporating more tweaks each time. At some point there will be no trace.
PS Ray, if you could expand on what you said here:
"The solution might still be a good investment as a working example, at which point it would be very difficult to differentiate between the solution we sell and one that you could create by mimicing the workflow demonstrated in the solution using our tools. "
we lesser souls would appreciate the input. How-to's, Videos. the usual fare.
Now nough said